Work

Case studies and selected engagements. Each example focuses on what was delivered and what outcomes it enabled.

Send a brief View services
Jump to case studies

Case studies

Concise proof: challenge → deliverables → outcomes.

Client identifiers are omitted by design. Deliverables are represented at a safe level of detail.

  • Mid-market B2B SaaS (growth-stage)

    Target architecture for platform modernization

    Product + engineering org • B2B SaaS • 4 weeks

    Aligned teams on a runnable target architecture and a phased modernization plan.

    Services

    • Enterprise Architecture

    Outcomes

    Decision cycle time: ↓ ~35% (weeks → days)

    • Rework from architectural drift: ↓ ~20% in first 60 days
    • Team alignment: Established (shared guardrails)
    ArchitectureModernizationPlatform
    Read case study

  • Scale-up with multiple product squads

    Product operating model for platform teams

    Product + engineering leadership • Technology • 4 weeks

    Improved cross-team execution by clarifying intake, priorities, and governance cadence.

    Services

    • Operating Model

    Outcomes

    Decision latency: ↓ ~40% (weeks → days)

    • Priority churn: ↓ ~25% within 8 weeks
    • Work intake clarity: Established (standard workflow)
    Operating ModelPlatformCadence
    Read case study

  • Financial services team (multi-system environment)

    Integration + API governance at scale

    Technology + delivery org • Financial Services • 5 weeks

    Reduced integration friction by standardizing patterns, ownership, and review gates.

    Services

    • Enterprise Architecture

    Outcomes

    Time to integrate a new system: ↓ from ~6 weeks to ~2–3 weeks

    • Breaking changes: ↓ ~30% within 90 days
    • API reuse: ↑ ~25% (reduced duplication)
    IntegrationAPIGovernance
    Read case study

  • Multi-team delivery org (competing priorities)

    Portfolio governance + decision cadence to reduce execution churn

    PMO / product ops / delivery leads • Cross-industry • 3 weeks

    Stabilized priorities with a weekly decision cadence and simple portfolio artifacts.

    Services

    • Operating Model

    Outcomes

    Mid-cycle priority changes: ↓ ~30% in first 6 weeks

    • Decision turnaround: ↓ from ~10 days to ~3 days
    • Progress visibility: Established (single portfolio view)
    GovernancePortfolioPrioritization
    Read case study

  • Healthcare ops + analytics team

    Data domain model + ownership for reliable reporting

    Cross-functional data stakeholders • Healthcare • 4 weeks

    Stabilized reporting by defining data domains, ownership, and accountable workflows.

    Services

    • Enterprise Architecture

    Outcomes

    Time to resolve definition disputes: ↓ from days to <24 hours

    • Reporting rework: ↓ ~25% in first quarter
    • Decision confidence: Improved (shared definitions)
    DataOwnershipGovernance
    Read case study

  • Operations-heavy org (high coordination cost)

    Role clarity + decision rights reset for faster execution

    Cross-functional leadership • Operations • 3 weeks

    Improved execution speed by clarifying ownership, interfaces, and decision boundaries.

    Services

    • Operating Model

    Outcomes

    Escalations: ↓ ~35% within 60 days

    • Recurring coordination meetings: ↓ ~20% (time reclaimed)
    • Decision clarity: Improved (explicit owners)
    Decision RightsRolesAccountability
    Read case study

  • Enterprise IT (multi-app portfolio)

    Cloud migration architecture roadmap with landing zone guardrails

    Infrastructure + apps leadership • Enterprise IT • 6 weeks

    Enabled safer migration with reference architectures, guardrails, and sequencing.

    Services

    • Enterprise Architecture

    Outcomes

    Environment provisioning: ↓ from days to <2 hours (baseline in place)

    • Migration lead time variance: ↓ ~30% (more predictable waves)
    • Security baseline adherence: Established (standard controls)
    CloudRoadmapGuardrails
    Read case study

  • Engineering org scaling services

    Internal developer platform: golden path + templates

    Platform engineering team • Technology • 6 weeks

    Accelerated delivery by standardizing the golden path and reducing setup friction.

    Services

    • Delivery Enablement

    Outcomes

    New service bootstrap time: ↓ from ~1–2 days to ~30–60 minutes

    • Pipeline consistency: ↑ (standard templates adopted)
    • Deployment friction: ↓ ~25% (fewer manual steps)
    Platform EngineeringDXTemplates
    Read case study

  • B2B product team with frequent releases

    Quality gates + release governance to reduce rework

    Engineering + QA leadership • B2B Software • 4 weeks

    Improved release reliability with consistent gates, definitions, and review rituals.

    Services

    • Delivery Enablement

    Outcomes

    Escaped defects: ↓ ~30% within 8–10 weeks

    • Release rollbacks: ↓ ~20% within 90 days
    • Release confidence: Improved (clear gates)
    QualityReleaseGovernance
    Read case study

  • Services org delivering complex projects

    Delivery playbooks, templates, and QA to standardize execution

    Delivery + operations leads • Professional Services • 3 weeks

    Reduced rework by standardizing delivery stages, templates, and QA checkpoints.

    Services

    • Delivery Enablement

    Outcomes

    Rework loops: ↓ ~25% within 6–8 weeks

    • New team onboarding time: ↓ ~50% (weeks → days)
    • Delivery consistency: Improved (standard stages)
    PlaybooksTemplatesQA
    Read case study

Want results like these?

Tell us your constraints and objectives. We’ll recommend the smallest engagement that produces meaningful momentum.

Send a brief Explore services